Comments on: Time to Update to Flex SDK 3.5a http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a Heroku | Java | Scala | Cloud | Open Source | Linux Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:54:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: Alan http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-161024 Alan Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:36:54 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-161024 OK, I got it framework_3.4.1.10084.swz from add-on package. It works now after clearing Global Storage here and try all again. http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html OK, I got it framework_3.4.1.10084.swz from add-on package. It works now after clearing Global Storage here and try all again.

http://www.macromedia.com/support/documentation/en/flashplayer/help/settings_manager03.html

]]> By: Alan http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-161023 Alan Thu, 18 Nov 2010 10:19:44 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-161023 The file framework_3.4.1.10084.swz is not found, just framework_3.4.1.10084.swf exists. I do not know why. This means that it is not cached in Flash Player but in browser only. The file framework_3.4.1.10084.swz is not found, just framework_3.4.1.10084.swf exists. I do not know why. This means that it is not cached in Flash Player but in browser only.

]]> By: songhuan http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-159015 songhuan Tue, 01 Jun 2010 02:19:37 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-159015 no error, and i back to the framework_3.4.0.9271 that can cache in the flash player AssetCache. i don't trust the sdk 3.6 no error, and i back to the framework_3.4.0.9271 that can cache in the flash player AssetCache. i don’t trust the sdk 3.6

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-159013 James Ward Mon, 31 May 2010 09:59:15 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-159013 It should cache. Are you getting an error? It should cache. Are you getting an error?

]]> By: songhuan http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-159012 songhuan Mon, 31 May 2010 09:28:12 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-159012 hello, i user the sdk of framework_3.4.1.10084.swz, but i found it that can't cache in the flash player AssetCache? you know why? thanks hello, i user the sdk of framework_3.4.1.10084.swz, but i found it that can’t cache in the flash player AssetCache?

you know why? thanks

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-158465 James Ward Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:35:17 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-158465 @Jamie That's a bummer. Looks like it is fixed for 3.6. @Jamie That’s a bummer. Looks like it is fixed for 3.6.

]]> By: Jamie McDaniel http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-158462 Jamie McDaniel Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:31:26 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-158462 Note that 3.5 has a <a href="http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23838" rel="nofollow">problem with ComboBoxes</a>. I found this out after updating to 3.5. The other developer wasn't seeing the issue and I eventually realized he was still on 3.4. A google search showed that others were reporting it in the <a href="http://forums.adobe.com/message/2560040" rel="nofollow">forums</a>. Note that 3.5 has a problem with ComboBoxes. I found this out after updating to 3.5. The other developer wasn’t seeing the issue and I eventually realized he was still on 3.4. A google search showed that others were reporting it in the forums.

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-158460 James Ward Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:05:25 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-158460 @magomarcelo The reason that I heard for why they didn't change the build number was that then they would have had to create new Framework RSLs. @magomarcelo The reason that I heard for why they didn’t change the build number was that then they would have had to create new Framework RSLs.

]]> By: magomarcelo http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-158459 magomarcelo Sat, 13 Feb 2010 20:00:44 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-158459 Anyway I didn't like how this 3.5a was released, the build number has been kept the same, I would have preferred a 3.5.1, that's what major.minor.bugfix versions are meant for. Anyway I didn’t like how this 3.5a was released, the build number has been kept the same, I would have preferred a 3.5.1, that’s what major.minor.bugfix versions are meant for.

]]> By: Tom Gruszowski http://www.jamesward.com/2010/02/12/time-to-update-to-flex-sdk-3-5a/comment-page-1/#comment-158455 Tom Gruszowski Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:02:40 +0000 http://www.jamesward.com/?p=1538#comment-158455 3.5 is FINALLY a good SDK. It's been quite frustrating how many regressions bugs came up with 3.4 to the point where we had to revert one app to 3.3. 3.2 was not even something to consider. I hope we can get better automated tests for Flex 4 but that is really wishful thinking until Flex 4.5 or so. This type of stuff just doesn't happen with Java/.NET 3.5 is FINALLY a good SDK. It’s been quite frustrating how many regressions bugs came up with 3.4 to the point where we had to revert one app to 3.3. 3.2 was not even something to consider. I hope we can get better automated tests for Flex 4 but that is really wishful thinking until Flex 4.5 or so. This type of stuff just doesn’t happen with Java/.NET

]]>