Comments on: BlazeBench: Why you want AMF and BlazeDS http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds Heroku | Java | Scala | Cloud | Open Source | Linux Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-160989 James Ward Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:30:15 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-160989 By default BlazeDS and RemoteObject always use a POST so the AMF response doesn't get cached. However that default can be overridden. It's not trivial but the new version of Census that I'm working on does it. Email me if you need more details: jaward at adobe dot com By default BlazeDS and RemoteObject always use a POST so the AMF response doesn’t get cached. However that default can be overridden. It’s not trivial but the new version of Census that I’m working on does it. Email me if you need more details: jaward at adobe dot com

]]> By: Reda Bendiar http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-160986 Reda Bendiar Tue, 09 Nov 2010 17:29:33 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-160986 AMF sure beats other styles hand down performance-wise. But XML and JSON can be cached client side. With BlazeDS , as far as i know, each request hits the server right ? I am about to start a project and still hesitating about the approch. One way would be to separate non-cacheable resources from cacheable ones, and use BlazeDS for the first and plain httprequest for the second category...is there anything wrong with this approach (afa architecture "best practices" are concerned) ? AMF sure beats other styles hand down performance-wise. But XML and JSON can be cached client side. With BlazeDS , as far as i know, each request hits the server right ? I am about to start a project and still hesitating about the approch.
One way would be to separate non-cacheable resources from cacheable ones, and use BlazeDS for the first and plain httprequest for the second category…is there anything wrong with this approach (afa architecture “best practices” are concerned) ?

]]> By: Flex AMFはJSON、XML、HTMLより遥かに速い | Kinopyo's Blog http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158808 Flex AMFはJSON、XML、HTMLより遥かに速い | Kinopyo's Blog Fri, 14 May 2010 08:11:43 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158808 [...] James Wardさんのブログから見たものです。 [...] [...] James Wardさんのブログから見たものです。 [...]

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158804 James Ward Fri, 14 May 2010 00:28:12 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158804 SOAP is currently broken in this version. Sorry. SOAP is currently broken in this version. Sorry.

]]> By: Jamie http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158796 Jamie Wed, 12 May 2010 14:09:36 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158796 Hey, Really excellent tool! Thanks for sharing.. Although i've had problems comparing the Flex Soap calls.. They return a WSDL retrieve error? Are those services still online? Cheers Hey,

Really excellent tool! Thanks for sharing..

Although i’ve had problems comparing the Flex Soap calls.. They return a WSDL retrieve error? Are those services still online?

Cheers

]]> By: Fost http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158732 Fost Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:08:12 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158732 Thanks, but I have seen this post, but I`m not shure that this test is fair. Thanks, but I have seen this post, but I`m not shure that this test is fair.

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158731 James Ward Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:20:03 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158731 @Fost Check out: http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/07/java-serialization-versus-amfhessian-serialization/ @Fost
Check out:
http://cornelcreanga.com/2009/07/java-serialization-versus-amfhessian-serialization/

]]> By: Fost http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158730 Fost Sun, 25 Apr 2010 10:15:27 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158730 Hi ! What you think about Hessian and AMF (only time serialization ) comparison ? Hi !
What you think about Hessian and AMF (only time serialization ) comparison ?

]]> By: James Ward http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158103 James Ward Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:41:43 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158103 Hi Stanislav, GZip is there as an option for AMF and all other tests. -James Hi Stanislav,

GZip is there as an option for AMF and all other tests.

-James

]]> By: Stanislav Zayarsky http://www.jamesward.com/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/comment-page-1/#comment-158102 Stanislav Zayarsky Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:18:50 +0000 http://www.jamesward.org/wordpress/2007/12/12/blazebench-why-you-want-amf-and-blazeds/#comment-158102 James, Please add gzip to AMF, it should be there as an option. We used gzip in our project and it did great compression 2 - 5 times. I understand that it will add time for unzipping, but let's try. James,

Please add gzip to AMF, it should be there as an option. We used gzip in our project and it did great compression 2 – 5 times. I understand that it will add time for unzipping, but let’s try.

]]>